Starting: 1st of Every Month 
+91 8409492687 
Contact@DevOpsSchool.com
| Parameter | MLflow on Laptop | Databricks MLflow | Azure ML + MLflow | SageMaker + MLflow | MLflow on Kubernetes |
| Setup Complexity | Very Low | None (Fully Managed) | Medium | Medium | High |
| Ease of Use | Easy for individuals | Very Easy | Moderate | Moderate | Complex |
| Scalability | Limited | High | High | High | Very High |
| Authentication & RBAC | No | Yes (Unity Catalog) | Yes (Azure AD) | Yes (IAM) | Yes (custom RBAC) |
| Multi-user Support | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Integration with CI/CD | Manual | Built-in | Azure Pipelines | AWS CodePipeline | Custom (Argo, Tekton) |
| Artifact Storage Options | Local file system or custom S3 | Managed (internal or external) | Azure Blob | S3 | Custom (e.g., S3, MinIO) |
| Model Registry | Manual setup | Integrated | Integrated | Manual integration | Custom setup |
| Best For | Learning, prototyping | Enterprises, production | Azure ecosystem users | AWS ecosystem users | DevOps-heavy teams |
| Cost | Free (local resources) | Paid (Databricks subscription) | Paid (Azure ML pricing) | Paid (SageMaker pricing) | Varies (infra + ops cost) |
| Cloud Dependency | None | Databricks (Cloud) | Azure | AWS | Cloud-agnostic |
| Maintenance Required | User-managed | None | Low (managed) | Low to Medium | High (fully user-managed) |
Thank you! Based on the comparison chart you provided, here is a quick summary and insights for each MLflow deployment type:
1. MLflow on Laptop
- Best for: Individual developers, learners, and prototyping
- Pros: Easy to install, no cloud dependency, free
- Cons: No multi-user support, not scalable, manual management
2. Databricks MLflow
- Best for: Enterprises running large-scale production ML workflows
- Pros: Fully managed, highly scalable, built-in CI/CD, secure with Unity Catalog
- Cons: Paid subscription, tied to Databricks ecosystem
3. Azure ML + MLflow
- Best for: Teams using Microsoft Azure infrastructure
- Pros: Good scalability, native Azure integration, RBAC via Azure AD
- Cons: Moderate setup, cost depends on Azure ML services
4. SageMaker + MLflow
- Best for: AWS users building end-to-end ML pipelines
- Pros: Leverages SageMaker training/deployment, integrates with AWS services
- Cons: Manual model registry, not natively managed MLflow
5. MLflow on Kubernetes
- Best for: Advanced DevOps teams needing full control and flexibility
- Pros: Extremely customizable, cloud-agnostic, supports large teams
- Cons: High complexity, requires infrastructure & maintenance
I’m a DevOps/SRE/DevSecOps/Cloud Expert passionate about sharing knowledge and experiences. I am working at Cotocus. I blog tech insights at DevOps School, travel stories at Holiday Landmark, stock market tips at Stocks Mantra, health and fitness guidance at My Medic Plus, product reviews at I reviewed , and SEO strategies at Wizbrand.
Please find my social handles as below;
Rajesh Kumar Personal Website
Rajesh Kumar at YOUTUBE
Rajesh Kumar at INSTAGRAM
Rajesh Kumar at X
Rajesh Kumar at FACEBOOK
Rajesh Kumar at LINKEDIN
Rajesh Kumar at PINTEREST
Rajesh Kumar at QUORA
Rajesh Kumar at WIZBRAND
